Explore the core concepts of t-SNE, a popular technique for visualizing high-dimensional data in data science and machine learning. This quiz assesses your understanding of how t-SNE works, its key parameters, and practical considerations for producing insightful visualizations.
What is the primary goal of t-SNE when applied to a high-dimensional dataset such as handwritten digit images?
Explanation: t-SNE is mainly used to visualize high-dimensional data by embedding it into lower dimensions, typically for easier inspection and interpretation. Compressing data for storage (A) or reducing the number of samples (B) are not the intended applications. Training a predictive model (D) is not the purpose of t-SNE, as it is an unsupervised technique intended for visualization.
Which type of data is most suitable for applying t-SNE: numeric measurements of multiple features or single-variable labels?
Explanation: t-SNE is designed to handle high-dimensional numeric measurements, allowing complex patterns to be visualized in low-dimensional maps. Categorical labels alone (B) do not offer features to reduce. Longitude and latitude pairs (C) are already low-dimensional, and time-series data (D) typically require preprocessing before t-SNE can be effective.
When using t-SNE, what is the most common target number of dimensions for the output embedding?
Explanation: t-SNE most often projects data into two dimensions, which enables users to create visual plots. One dimension (A) loses too much structure, while ten (C) or one hundred (D) dimensions are still too high for simple visualization and are not typical targets for t-SNE usage.
Compared to Principal Component Analysis (PCA), what is a key difference of t-SNE?
Explanation: t-SNE emphasizes the preservation of local similarities between points, making it different from PCA, which retains as much global variance as possible. t-SNE is not supervised (B) and does not guarantee the same output every run due to randomness (D). It does not focus on global data variance (A), which is PCA's focus.
In t-SNE, what does the perplexity parameter mainly control during the embedding process?
Explanation: Perplexity influences how t-SNE weighs local neighborhoods versus broader group structures, impacting the embedding's appearance. It does not set the number of output dimensions (A), nor does it control dataset size (B) or directly regulate optimization speed (D), though it can indirectly affect computation.
Why might t-SNE produce different visualizations on different runs, even with the same data and parameters?
Explanation: t-SNE can yield different results due to its random starting points in the optimization process. It does not randomly discard data (A), always reduce to one dimension (C), or change the underlying dataset's structure (D). Random initialization (B) is the main reason for result variability.
If a t-SNE plot of animal data shows tight, separate clusters, what does this most likely indicate?
Explanation: Tight and separate clusters in a t-SNE plot typically suggest that the input data contains groups sharing similar features. Alphabetical sorting (A) and random colors (C) do not influence the spatial arrangement, and while t-SNE can sometimes induce artificial clusters, this is more likely when parameters are misused (D), not in a typical reasonable setup.
One notable limitation of t-SNE is that it can require significant computation time. For which scenario is this most likely a problem?
Explanation: t-SNE becomes computationally intensive as dataset size increases, especially when working with tens of thousands or more samples. Small datasets (A) or those with few features (B) process quickly, while categorical label-only data (D) is not suitable for t-SNE at all.
In a 2D t-SNE plot, what can you generally say about the closeness of two points?
Explanation: In t-SNE visualizations, nearby points most often share similar high-dimensional feature values. Sorting by time (B) or identical values (C) is not implied. Points could be in the same cluster (D), but closeness mainly reflects high-dimensional similarity, not strict cluster membership.
Which practice can help prevent over-interpretation or overfitting of patterns seen in t-SNE plots?
Explanation: Repeating t-SNE with various runs and parameter settings helps ensure that observed patterns are robust and not artifacts of random initialization or specific choices. Running it once with random settings (A) or ignoring perplexity (B) may lead to misleading results, while always using small samples (D) may not adequately represent the data.