Assess your understanding of tokenization techniques and fine-tuning strategies in modern transformer models. This quiz features key concepts, useful practices, and common terminology in natural language processing, helping you grasp essential steps for effective model customization.
What is the main role of tokenization when preparing text data for a transformer-based model?
Explanation: Tokenization breaks down text into units that models can process, such as words or subwords, enabling effective embedding and analysis. Translating or sorting text does not create meaningful input for language models. Finding synonyms changes the meaning rather than preparing data for input.
Why are special tokens like [CLS] and [SEP] added during tokenization in transformer models?
Explanation: Special tokens such as [CLS] and [SEP] help models recognize sentence boundaries or identify the start of sequences, crucial for various tasks. They are not used for grammatical corrections or altering word frequencies. Randomizing inputs would disrupt model understanding.
Which tokenizer type most effectively manages rare or unknown words by splitting them into subword units?
Explanation: Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenizers decompose rare words into frequent subwords, allowing better handling of unfamiliar vocabulary. Rule-based tokenizers typically split on whitespace or punctuation and may not handle rare words efficiently. Whole word tokenizers don't split words, while character-case tokenizers are not standard in this context.
When batching input sequences of different lengths, what is the purpose of padding?
Explanation: Padding ensures that all input sequences in a batch are of equal length, facilitating efficient computation. It does not serve privacy or speed up tokenization tasks directly. Attention selection is managed through separate mechanisms, not padding.
In the context of fine-tuning, what does it mean to customize a pre-trained transformer on a new dataset?
Explanation: Fine-tuning involves continuing to train a pre-trained model with a new, task-specific dataset so its weights adapt to the targeted application. Creating a new architecture is not fine-tuning, merely adjusting the tokenizer is insufficient, and reducing data typically reduces model performance rather than fine-tune.
What is one main benefit of using a pre-trained transformer model before fine-tuning on your own text data?
Explanation: Leveraging a pre-trained model allows the use of less task-specific data because the model has already learned general language patterns. Perfect accuracy is never guaranteed, tokenization is still required, and the model does not predict labels for future data without training.
If an input sentence is longer than the model's maximum sequence length, what is typically done during tokenization?
Explanation: Truncating longer sequences ensures consistency with the model's input size limits. Adding padding beyond this limit is not supported, and discarding data reduces dataset size unnecessarily. Reversing sequences is not a standard practice in tokenization.
During fine-tuning for classification, why is it important to map category names to integer labels?
Explanation: Most models expect integer-encoded labels for classification tasks. Lengthening the data or decreasing token numbers are not reasons for label mapping, and optimizer speed is not directly influenced by label names.
What does it mean to 'freeze' some layers of a transformer model during fine-tuning?
Explanation: Freezing layers means their parameters do not change, preserving previously learned representations and sometimes reducing computational cost. It does not refer to numerical type changes or physical relocation in architecture. Increasing speed is a possible effect, not the definition.
When a tokenizer encounters a completely unknown word not in its vocabulary, what typically happens?
Explanation: Unknown tokens signal the model that a part of the input was not represented in the vocabulary. Replacing, deleting, or auto-learning meanings are not standard in tokenization, as complete context or semantics would be lost or misrepresented.