Challenge your reasoning skills with this Data Sufficiency Logical Problem Solving Quiz. Evaluate statements and determine if the provided information is enough to answer each logical question with confidence.
Given that Tony has more apples than Sarah, and Sarah has more than Tom, is it sufficient to determine who has the most apples?
Explanation: The information states Tony u003E Sarah u003E Tom, so Tony has the most apples. The number is not needed for the rank order. 'No, the statements are insufficient' is incorrect since it does provide enough. The third option is misleading because knowing exact numbers is unnecessary. The last option is false and even contradicts the given statements.
If a number x is odd, and x + 3 is even, is this information sufficient to determine if x is divisible by 2?
Explanation: Since x is odd, it cannot be divisible by 2. The statement 'Yes, x is divisible by 2' contradicts this. There's no need to know if x is greater than 10; that doesn't affect divisibility. 'Insufficient information' is incorrect, as the parity alone provides sufficiency.
Maria is taller than John, and John is taller than Emma. Is this information sufficient to determine if Maria is taller than Emma?
Explanation: The ordering implies Maria u003E John u003E Emma, so Maria is definitely taller than Emma. 'No' is incorrect as the logical sequence is clear. The same height scenario does not match with the 'taller' relationships given. The final option contradicts the provided order.
If Sarah has x candies and Paul has double that amount, is the information sufficient to find how many more candies Paul has than Sarah?
Explanation: Paul has 2x candies, Sarah has x, so Paul has x more. The specific value of x isn't required for the difference. 'No, because x is unknown' ignores that the expression is in terms of x. The third and fourth options needlessly restrict or dismiss what is already calculable.
Given: (1) Peter lives in New York; (2) New York is in the USA. Is the information sufficient to say Peter lives in the USA?
Explanation: Only together do the statements confirm Peter's country. Statement 1 alone gives the city, but not the country. Statement 2 is a general fact, not about Peter. Saying 'not enough information' is incorrect, as combining both answers the question fully.
If today is Monday and Alice will visit in three days, is the information sufficient to determine on which day Alice will visit?
Explanation: Counting three days ahead from Monday leads to Thursday. 'No, days not specified' is incorrect, as days are precisely listed. The third option adds irrelevant details about time. 'The information is incomplete' is not accurate because all necessary data is present.
Given that y is an even integer and y = 2z, is this sufficient to state that z is also an integer?
Explanation: If y is an even integer and divided by 2, z will always be an integer. 'No, z can be non-integer' ignores the even integer property. The sign of y has no impact, refuting the third choice. The last option is incorrect since the specific value of y is not needed.
If a + b = 10 and a = 4, is it sufficient to solve for b?
Explanation: Substituting a = 4 into a + b = 10 allows solving b = 6. The other answers imply uncertainty or unnecessary constraints. 'No, more information needed', 'Only if b is less than a', and 'Cannot be determined' are all incorrect due to the direct solvability.
Given: (1) Sam is older than Alex; (2) Alex has a twin sibling. Is this information sufficient to determine who is older between Sam and Alex's twin?
Explanation: Alex's twin is the same age as Alex, so Sam is older than both. 'No, the information is insufficient' is wrong because the twin's age is implied. The third option adds a condition not present, and the last option misinterprets 'twin'.
If 2p = 8, is this information sufficient to find the value of p?
Explanation: Dividing both sides by 2 gives p = 4. 'No, need more data' is incorrect as no other information is necessary. The sign choice is a distractor but unnecessary since 2p = 8 yields only p = 4. 'The equation is inconsistent' is false, since it solves neatly.