Go Memory Management and Garbage Collection Quiz Quiz

Challenge your understanding of Go memory management and garbage collection processes with these beginner-level questions. This quiz explores automatic memory allocation, pointer safety, garbage collection triggers, and best practices essential for efficient resource handling in Go.

  1. Go's Automatic Memory Management

    Which part of the Go language automatically frees memory that is no longer needed by the program?

    1. Memory Allocator
    2. Stack Handler
    3. Garbage Collector
    4. Pointer Manager

    Explanation: The garbage collector in Go is responsible for automatically identifying and freeing memory that is no longer referenced. The Pointer Manager and Stack Handler are not standard Go components. The Memory Allocator requests memory but does not free it automatically. Only the garbage collector ensures unused memory is reclaimed.

  2. Escape Analysis in Go

    What does escape analysis in Go primarily determine during compilation?

    1. If a variable should be converted into a pointer
    2. When the garbage collector should run
    3. Whether a variable should be stored on the heap or stack
    4. How to optimize CPU usage

    Explanation: Escape analysis decides if a variable's lifetime exceeds its function and thus must be stored on the heap, or if it can safely stay on the stack. It does not convert variables to pointers or manage garbage collection timing. Optimizing CPU usage is unrelated.

  3. Triggering Garbage Collection

    Which event can trigger Go’s garbage collector to start a collection cycle?

    1. An infinite loop in user code
    2. Using a deferred function
    3. Compiling the program
    4. Heap memory usage exceeding a threshold

    Explanation: When heap memory usage grows beyond a certain limit, the garbage collector is triggered to reclaim space. Infinite loops, compiling, and deferred functions do not directly initiate garbage collection. This ensures effective memory management as the program runs.

  4. Memory Allocation Functions

    Which Go built-in function is commonly used to allocate zeroed storage for a type and returns its address?

    1. reserve
    2. append
    3. new
    4. malloc

    Explanation: The 'new' function allocates zeroed storage for a type and returns a pointer to it. 'malloc' is not a Go built-in function; 'append' works with slices but does not allocate zeroed storage for generic types. 'reserve' is not a Go function.

  5. Locating Dangling Pointers

    Why are dangling pointers usually not a problem in Go's memory management model?

    1. Go uses reference counting only
    2. Go automatically manages memory and tracks references
    3. Garbage collection never frees memory
    4. Developers must manually free all memory

    Explanation: Go tracks references to memory blocks and only frees them when not in use, minimizing risks of dangling pointers. Manual memory management is not required, and Go’s garbage collector is not limited to reference counting. Contrary to option D, garbage collection does free memory.

  6. Garbage Collection Mechanism

    What method does Go's garbage collector primarily use to identify memory that can be reclaimed?

    1. Reference counting exclusively
    2. Stack-only memory analysis
    3. Tracing reachable objects from roots
    4. Monitoring pointer assignments in real time

    Explanation: Go's garbage collector traces objects reachable from program roots and reclaims memory for those unreachable. Only using reference counting has limitations, and stack-only analysis ignores heap data. Monitoring pointer assignments exclusively does not fully track object lifetimes.

  7. Pointer Safety in Go

    In Go, what happens if the only reference to an object is removed, and no pointers exist to it?

    1. It causes a runtime error immediately
    2. The memory is automatically moved to the stack
    3. The garbage collector can reclaim it
    4. It must be freed manually by the developer

    Explanation: If there are no references left to an object, the garbage collector can reclaim its memory. There is no immediate runtime error, and memory is never moved from heap to stack. Manual memory freeing is not required in Go.

  8. Memory Leaks in Go

    Which situation could still cause a memory leak in a Go program, despite having garbage collection?

    1. Using goroutines
    2. Lack of manual memory management
    3. Retaining references to unused objects
    4. Frequent function calls

    Explanation: If a program holds references to objects no longer needed, the garbage collector cannot reclaim them, leading to a memory leak. Manual management is not applicable, and merely using goroutines or frequent function calls does not inherently cause leaks.

  9. Stack vs Heap Allocation

    Which statement correctly describes the difference between stack and heap memory allocation in Go?

    1. Stack allocation is faster and temporary, while heap allocation is slower and used for longer-lived data
    2. Heap allocation is faster than stack and always used for local variables
    3. Stack variables persist beyond function calls, unlike heap variables
    4. Heap allocation can only be done with global variables

    Explanation: Stack allocation is quick and used for data local to function calls, while heap allocation incurs more overhead and supports data with longer lifetimes. Heap allocation is not inherently faster, and stack variables do not persist after the function returns. Heap is not restricted to global variables.

  10. Optimizing for Garbage Collection

    Which is a recommended practice to help Go’s garbage collector work efficiently?

    1. Manually invoke the garbage collector after each function
    2. Reduce the number of unnecessary pointer references
    3. Always use global variables for large objects
    4. Disable stack allocation entirely

    Explanation: Fewer unnecessary pointer references allow the collector to identify unused data more easily and reclaim memory. Using global variables for large objects may make cleanup harder. Manual garbage collection is rarely needed, and disabling stack allocation is not possible or beneficial.