Test your understanding of key Python interview topics, including concurrency, asynchronous execution, and the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). This quiz helps you quickly review essential Python concepts relevant for technical interviews.
Which of the following best describes concurrency in Python with an example?
Explanation: Concurrency is about running multiple tasks in overlapping time periods, even if not truly simultaneously, much like a chef preparing different dishes by switching back and forth. The second and fourth options describe strictly sequential execution, not concurrency. The third option refers to blocking behavior, which is the opposite of concurrency.
In Python, what is the key feature of asynchronous execution using async/await?
Explanation: Asynchronous execution in Python uses an event loop and async/await to allow tasks to pause and resume, enabling non-blocking behavior in a single thread. The second option incorrectly describes parallelism, not asynchrony. The third option confuses asynchronous execution with multiprocessing. The fourth option is the opposite of asynchronous execution.
What is the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) in Python?
Explanation: The GIL ensures only one native thread can execute Python bytecode at a time in CPython. It doesn't prevent parallelism via separate processes, which makes option two wrong. Option three is incorrect because GIL impacts threads, not async code. The last option has nothing to do with GIL.
Which Python module is typically used for concurrency with I/O-bound tasks?
Explanation: The 'threading' module is commonly used to manage concurrency for I/O-bound tasks in Python. 'random' is used for generating random numbers and is unrelated. 'selct' is a misspelling of 'select', which is useful for low-level I/O multiplexing but not typically used for threading. 'format' is used for formatting strings.
In Python, when should you prefer multiprocessing over multithreading?
Explanation: Multiprocessing is preferable for CPU-bound tasks because it bypasses the GIL; each process has its own Python interpreter and memory space. Multithreading works better for I/O-bound tasks, not CPU-bound ones. Tasks involving waiting for user input or formatting outputs do not require multiprocessing.
What type of task would benefit most from Python's async programming with async/await?
Explanation: Async programming excels at handling many I/O-bound tasks, like making multiple API calls, without blocking operations. The other three options are CPU-bound computations and would not benefit from async/await; those cases are better handled by multiprocessing if needed.
What is the purpose of the event loop in asynchronous Python programming?
Explanation: The event loop coordinates and schedules asynchronous tasks, allowing them to pause and resume efficiently. The second and third options refer to locking mechanisms and process limitations, not event loops. The fourth option is irrelevant to the event loop's function.
How does the GIL affect multi-threaded CPU-bound programs in Python?
Explanation: The GIL restricts CPU-bound threads from running in parallel, impacting their performance negatively. The second option is incorrect; GIL doesn't speed up programs or offer more memory. The third option is false since GIL directly impacts CPU-bound programs. The last option is a misconception, as strict GIL management can slow down execution.
Which of the following is an example of an I/O-bound task that benefits from multithreading or async programming in Python?
Explanation: Downloading files involves waiting for network operations, an I/O-bound task ideal for multithreading or async programming. The other options are CPU-bound computations, which do not benefit from these approaches due to the GIL's constraints.
Which technique allows for true parallel execution of Python code for CPU-intensive tasks?
Explanation: Multiprocessing starts separate Python processes, enabling true parallel execution and bypassing the GIL. The second option, format(), is unrelated. The third option only allows non-blocking I/O but does not achieve parallel CPU computation. The fourth option is limited by the GIL and does not deliver true parallelism for CPU-bound tasks.