Arrays u0026 Strings: Advanced Concepts and Techniques Quiz

Challenge your understanding of advanced concepts in arrays and strings, including manipulation techniques, algorithmic approaches, and complex data processing scenarios. Strengthen your problem-solving skills with questions that cover multidimensional arrays, string algorithms, and nuanced manipulation strategies.

  1. Multidimensional Array Traversal

    Which approach is most efficient for finding a specific value in a sorted 2D array where each row and column is sorted in ascending order?

    1. Traverse the array row by row using linear search
    2. Randomly select starting points and check surrounding elements
    3. Start from the top-right corner and eliminate rows or columns based on comparison
    4. Use binary search independently on each row without considering columns

    Explanation: Starting from the top-right corner allows for elimination of either a row or a column at each step based on the value comparison, making it much more efficient for this sorted 2D array structure. Traversing row by row using linear search ignores the benefits of sorting and is slower. Binary searching each row overlooks column sorting, potentially missing efficiencies. Random selection is inefficient and unpredictable for systematic searching.

  2. String Immutability in Programming

    Why is it usually inefficient to repeatedly concatenate strings in a loop when building a large string (for example, in languages where strings are immutable)?

    1. Each concatenation creates a new string object, copying over previous content
    2. String concatenation compresses the data, causing extra overhead
    3. Concatenation changes the original string in memory
    4. Each concatenation sorts the string, which is resource-intensive

    Explanation: In languages with immutable strings, every concatenation produces a new object and copies existing characters, resulting in increased time and space complexity. The original string in memory is not changed, disproving the second choice. String concatenation does not inherently compress or sort string data, so the third and fourth options are incorrect.

  3. Sliding Window Technique

    When searching for the length of the longest substring without repeating characters, which technique is typically the most efficient?

    1. Bidirectional binary search
    2. Brute force checking all substrings
    3. Sorting the string before checking
    4. Sliding window with a hash set

    Explanation: A sliding window combined with a hash set enables efficient checking for repeats as the window expands and contracts, yielding linear time complexity. Brute force is much slower since it checks all possible substrings. Sorting the string does not help in preserving substring order or detecting immediate repeats. Bidirectional binary search is not relevant for substring uniqueness problems.

  4. Array Rotation Complexity

    What is the time complexity for rotating a one-dimensional array of length n to the right by k steps using the reversal algorithm?

    1. O(log n)
    2. O(k)
    3. O(n^2)
    4. O(n)

    Explanation: The reversal algorithm requires three reversals of array segments, each running in linear time, so the entire rotation is O(n). O(k) is not correct because the time does not depend solely on k. O(n^2) would indicate much slower nested operations, which is not the case. O(log n) does not apply, as no logarithmic process is involved.

  5. Longest Palindromic Substring Identification

    Which approach can find the longest palindromic substring in a given string in O(n^2) time and O(1) space?

    1. Expand around each center
    2. Use a rolling hash for all substrings
    3. Build a suffix tree
    4. Recursively reverse and check substrings

    Explanation: Expanding around each character (or pair) treats each as a potential palindrome center and efficiently checks for the longest one in O(n^2) time and O(1) space. Rolling hash and suffix tree methods either require extra space or more advanced time complexities. Recursively reversing and checking substrings is inefficient and can greatly increase space and time usage.