Question 1
Which primary criticism does the author make about companies that require coding tests as the sole evaluation metric in technical interviews?
- They only assess a narrow set of skills, ignoring a candidate's broader abilities.
- They always take too long to administer and delay the process.
- They indicate that the company is highly innovative and forward-thinking.
- They ensure that self-taught developers always pass.
- They eliminate the need for any human judgment during hiring.
Question 2
According to the context, what adverse effect can mandatory coding tests have on experienced or highly competent developers during interviews?
- They can cause such candidates to appear less capable if they do not perform well on an obscure or irrelevant question.
- They help these developers showcase their teamwork in real-time scenarios.
- They guarantee that only junior candidates are selected for further rounds.
- They exclusively evaluate the candidates' communication skills.
- They are always tailored to each candidate's specific work history.
Question 3
What analogy does the author reference to highlight the flaw in evaluating all candidates by one uniform standard, such as a coding test?
- Judging a fish by its ability to climb a tree
- Comparing apples to oranges in a fruit basket
- Teaching a lion to swim in a pond
- Measuring water using a sieve
- Grading a bird by its running speed
Question 4
In the described anecdote, what problematic practice did the interviewer use when administering coding tests to candidates?
- Selecting unfamiliar coding questions from online sources and not being able to solve them themselves
- Creating customized problems based on each candidate's personal background
- Conducting live group discussions to collaboratively solve the challenge
- Utilizing behavioral questions instead of coding problems
- Allowing candidates to choose between math puzzles or coding tasks
Question 5
According to the passage, how does a mandatory coding test requirement most commonly reflect on an employer's understanding of developer quality and measurement?
- It suggests a lack of understanding about what truly makes a quality developer and how to evaluate success holistically.
- It proves the employer always values creativity over technical skill.
- It indicates the employer prefers to avoid structured evaluation.
- It shows the employer relies solely on candidate references.
- It ensures all candidates are evaluated only on teamwork activities.