Explore core concepts of Peterson’s Algorithm and software locks with this quiz focusing on mutual exclusion, process synchronization, and lock mechanisms. Enhance your understanding of concurrent programming, critical sections, and classic synchronization problems.
What is the primary purpose of Peterson's Algorithm in concurrent programming involving two processes?
Explanation: Peterson's Algorithm is specifically designed to achieve mutual exclusion for two concurrent processes needing shared resource access. It prevents both from entering the critical section simultaneously. The distractors are incorrect because the algorithm does not directly improve execution speed, does not focus on power efficiency, and does not deal with allocating memory.
Which term best describes the segment of code that should not be executed by more than one process at the same time?
Explanation: A critical section is the code area where shared resources are accessed, requiring mutual exclusion. Loop iteration refers to repeated code but does not imply exclusive access. Hard drive sector and swap file have no direct relation to process synchronization or mutual exclusion, making them irrelevant options.
In Peterson’s Algorithm, which two variables are fundamental for achieving synchronization between two processes?
Explanation: Peterson’s Algorithm relies on the flag[] array to signal intent and the turn variable to control priority. Lock and key or token and counter are not used in this algorithm. The 'switch and flagg' option contains a typo and is not accurate.
Which statement correctly describes a software lock in concurrent programming?
Explanation: Software locks are synchronization tools that allow only one process or thread into a critical section at a time, preventing race conditions. The distractors are wrong because software locks do not encrypt data or manage graphical interfaces or energy consumption.
Which of the following is an example of a spinlock in software synchronization?
Explanation: A spinlock works by having a process continuously check for lock availability, as opposed to sleeping or waiting. Hardware switches are unrelated to software locks. Network transmission speed and locks allowing multiple processes in a critical section do not describe spinlock behavior.
In Peterson’s Algorithm, what is the main role of the 'turn' variable for two processes, such as P0 and P1?
Explanation: The 'turn' variable decides which process has the priority to enter the critical section if both want access. It is not used for data storage, memory allocation, or managing output, making the other options unrelated to the purpose of 'turn'.
How does Peterson's Algorithm prevent deadlock when both processes attempt to enter the critical section at the same time?
Explanation: Peterson’s Algorithm relies on the 'turn' variable to ensure only one process continues if both attempt entry, thus preventing deadlock. Random numbers and forcibly killing a process do not prevent deadlocks in this context. Processor speed doesn't address synchronization logic.
What is a known limitation of Peterson’s Algorithm?
Explanation: Peterson's Algorithm is mainly suitable for two processes; extending it to more processes becomes complex. It is a software solution, not hardware-based, and works independently of application type. It can still function under certain modern systems, though hardware optimizations may limit its effectiveness.
Which situation is an example of a race condition in concurrent programs?
Explanation: A race condition occurs when shared data is accessed concurrently without proper synchronization, as in the shared counter example. User speed, single-thread crash, and small memory are not synchronization issues related to race conditions.
Why are software locks commonly used in multithreaded programs?
Explanation: Software locks ensure only one thread accesses critical data at a time, preventing conflicts and corruption. The distractors—generating passwords, faster graphics, or reducing power—are unrelated to the goal of software locks in code synchronization.