Cassandra Performance Tuning and Optimization Quiz Quiz

Explore key strategies for maximizing Cassandra efficiency with this beginner-friendly quiz designed to cover core concepts in performance tuning, data modeling, and cluster optimization. Perfect for anyone seeking actionable insights into improving write throughput, read performance, and system resource use within Cassandra environments.

  1. Choosing the Right Compaction Strategy

    Which compaction strategy is generally recommended for write-heavy workloads in Cassandra, especially when using time-series data?

    1. Size-Tiered Compaction Strategy
    2. TimeWindow Compaction Strategy
    3. Leveled Compaction Strategy
    4. Hybrid Compaction Strategy

    Explanation: TimeWindow Compaction Strategy is especially suitable for time-series data and write-heavy workloads, as it organizes tombstones and data by time windows, making data deletion and compaction more efficient. Leveled and Size-Tiered strategies serve different scenarios, with Leveled focusing on read-heavy environments and Size-Tiered favoring general write load but not time-series specifics. Hybrid isn't a standard built-in compaction strategy.

  2. Impact of Consistency Level on Performance

    How does increasing the consistency level from ONE to QUORUM typically affect write latency in a Cassandra cluster?

    1. Latency becomes unpredictable
    2. It decreases latency significantly
    3. There is no change in latency
    4. Write latency increases

    Explanation: Raising the consistency level means that more replicas must acknowledge the write before it is confirmed, which typically increases write latency. Decreasing latency is the opposite of what occurs. While variance can exist, 'unpredictable' isn't accurate for default scenarios, and there will always be some change, making 'no change' incorrect.

  3. Role of Memtables in Write Performance

    What is the primary function of memtables in Cassandra’s architecture regarding write operations?

    1. They store data permanently on disk
    2. They replicate data to other nodes
    3. They buffer incoming writes in memory
    4. They organize data for faster reads only

    Explanation: Memtables temporarily store incoming write operations in memory before flushing them as SSTables on disk, helping speed up writes and batching disk operations. They do not replicate data; that’s handled separately. Reads are not their focus, and permanent storage is the role of SSTables, not memtables.

  4. Use of Partition Keys for Even Data Distribution

    Why is choosing an appropriate partition key critical for data distribution and performance in Cassandra?

    1. It ensures queries run faster by skipping compaction
    2. It prevents data loss during node failure
    3. It reduces the replication factor automatically
    4. It distributes data evenly across all nodes

    Explanation: A well-designed partition key helps spread data evenly throughout the cluster, improving both load distribution and cluster performance. It doesn’t directly prevent data loss or change the replication factor. Also, partition keys don’t affect compaction directly or cause compaction to be skipped.

  5. Effect of Bloom Filters on Read Performance

    How does enabling and tuning Bloom filters influence read operations in Cassandra?

    1. They organize data for network transmission
    2. They slow down writes significantly
    3. They compress data to save space
    4. They speed up read processes by filtering unnecessary disk lookups

    Explanation: Bloom filters act as a fast, probablistic mechanism to avoid unnecessary disk reads by indicating if a data row may exist in an SSTable, thus improving read performance. They do not compress data or organize it for network transfer, and their memory requirements, while present, do not significantly slow down writes.

  6. Understanding Write Amplification

    Which operation most directly contributes to write amplification in Cassandra, potentially impacting IO performance?

    1. Increased heap size
    2. Secondary index usage
    3. Batched mutations
    4. Frequent flushes from memtables

    Explanation: Frequent flushes create many small SSTables, which later require more compaction and rewriting of data, leading to increased write amplification. Batched mutations can reduce amplification by grouping writes. Increasing heap size may aid in performance but isn’t direct cause of write amplification, and secondary indexes affect reads more than writes.

  7. Tuning Java Heap Size

    When adjusting Java heap size for Cassandra, what is a best practice regarding overall system stability?

    1. The heap size should not exceed 100 MB
    2. Setting heap size too large may cause more frequent garbage collection pauses
    3. Using the maximum value supported by Java
    4. Allocating 90% of system RAM to heap

    Explanation: Large heaps can cause longer garbage collection pauses, which may negatively impact performance. Allocating 90% of RAM is excessive and can starve other processes, while setting the maximum Java value is rarely optimal. Limiting the heap to under 100 MB would be inadequate except for extremely small test clusters.

  8. Effect of Data Model on Query Performance

    In Cassandra, how does denormalizing tables typically affect query performance?

    1. It decreases the write speed substantially
    2. It prevents the use of primary keys
    3. It improves query efficiency by reducing the number of joins needed
    4. It always causes slower queries due to data duplication

    Explanation: Denormalizing tables allows queries to fetch data without performing complex joins, which enhances read efficiency. Data duplication increases storage usage, not necessarily slowing queries, and write speed impact is usually minor compared to the benefit for reads. Primary keys are still heavily used in denormalized designs.

  9. Cache Settings for Hot Data

    What is the primary benefit of tuning key and row caches in Cassandra for frequently accessed (hot) data?

    1. Enabling secondary indexing
    2. Faster random read access
    3. Faster compactions
    4. Automatic backup of data

    Explanation: Caching key and row data in memory allows Cassandra to quickly retrieve hot data without repeated disk access, greatly improving random read performance. Caches do not perform backups, nor do they participate directly in compactions or enable secondary indexes.

  10. Monitoring Write and Read Latency

    Which indicator would most directly suggest a need for tuning performance if significantly elevated in a Cassandra cluster under normal load?

    1. Number of unique partition keys
    2. High write and read latency metrics
    3. Low replication factor
    4. Node IP address range

    Explanation: Sustained high latency for writes and reads indicates performance bottlenecks that require tuning. Replication factor is a design parameter but not an immediate sign of a performance issue. The number of partition keys relates to data distribution, while IP ranges are irrelevant to performance.