Explore essential concepts of CI/CD pipelines and their pivotal role in secure software delivery within DevSecOps practices. This quiz is designed to help you understand security integration, automation, benefits, and potential risks in cloud-based DevOps environments.
What does the abbreviation 'CI/CD' stand for in the context of secure software delivery within DevSecOps?
Explanation: Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) describes the automation of integrating code changes and deploying them in software development. 'Central Integration/Cloud Deployment' is incorrect as it is not widely recognized. 'Continuous Improvement/Continuous Delivery' misstates the industry usage. 'Cyber Inspection/Code Distribution' is unrelated to the standard terminology and thus not correct.
Why is automated testing integrated into CI/CD pipelines in DevSecOps environments?
Explanation: Automated testing in CI/CD helps detect issues, including security vulnerabilities, as soon as code is integrated. It does not replace manual reviews completely; instead, it complements them. Eliminating all human involvement is not the goal, and delaying delivery until tests are perfect is not practical as it hampers agility.
In a secure CI/CD pipeline, what does 'shifting security left' mean?
Explanation: 'Shifting security left' encourages early integration of security, making it an integral part of development workflows. Waiting until the release or after deployment makes it harder and costlier to fix issues. Endpoint security, while important, is not the same as 'shifting left'. Outsourcing all security after deployment ignores early-stage risks.
What is a main advantage of automating CI/CD pipelines for secure cloud-based applications?
Explanation: Automation in pipelines cuts down manual mistakes that can introduce vulnerabilities. Automation cannot guarantee continuous uptime or prevent cloud outages, which may stem from external factors. Security policies remain essential, regardless of automation levels.
How should sensitive credentials such as API keys be handled in a secure CI/CD pipeline?
Explanation: Storing secrets in encrypted management systems ensures that sensitive data is protected and access is controlled. Hard-coding secrets or uploading them in public repositories risks exposure. Manually emailing secrets invites accidental leaks and is not considered secure.
What is the primary purpose of continuous monitoring in a DevSecOps CI/CD pipeline?
Explanation: Continuous monitoring enables rapid detection and response to security threats after deployment. It does not replace reviews, which still play a role in quality assurance. While automation can help with scaling, monitoring itself is about risks, not resources or pricing.
Which type of security analysis is typically performed early in the CI/CD process to inspect source code without executing programs?
Explanation: SAST inspects code for vulnerabilities early, without running the application. 'Dynamic Application Security Timing' is not a standard term. The other options are either incorrect or incorrectly named acronyms, so they do not represent accepted methods.
When a security vulnerability is detected in the CI/CD pipeline, what is the best recommended action?
Explanation: Halting the pipeline upon detecting vulnerabilities helps prevent insecure code from reaching production. Deploying and fixing issues later increases risks. Ignoring issues or removing test steps may expose software to attacks or failures.
Why should Infrastructure as Code (IaC) files, such as configuration scripts, be included in CI/CD security scans?
Explanation: IaC files define infrastructure and can contain exploitable misconfigurations. They are frequently updated and not immune to errors. Ignoring them could expose systems to unintentional risks, and they are fundamental to secure deployment processes.
What is a fundamental security practice for managing CI/CD pipeline access in a DevSecOps environment?
Explanation: Allowing only necessary access—least privilege—minimizes the attack surface in pipelines. Public or broad administrative access increases the risk of unauthorized changes. Disabling authentication undermines both security and accountability.