Challenge your understanding of high availability and fault tolerance concepts relevant to EC2 instances. This quiz covers availability zones, load balancing, redundancy, auto scaling, and practical design strategies to ensure continuous service in cloud environments.
Which strategy helps ensure high availability for applications by distributing EC2 instances across multiple geographical locations called availability zones?
Explanation: Deploying EC2 instances across multiple availability zones protects applications from localized failures, increasing resilience and uptime. Using only one zone creates a single point of failure, while deploying on reserved hosts or choosing the smallest instance types does not inherently improve availability. Spreading resources is a foundational principle of high availability design.
What does it mean for an EC2 deployment to be fault tolerant in case of a hardware failure?
Explanation: A fault-tolerant deployment is designed to continue functioning, often seamlessly, even when a component fails. Requiring manual restarts still results in downtime, and no system can guarantee the prevention of hardware failures entirely. Scheduled shutdowns are unrelated to fault tolerance and may actually decrease availability.
How does a load balancer improve high availability for EC2-based web applications?
Explanation: Load balancers ensure requests are routed only to healthy application instances, enhancing availability. Increasing traffic to the busiest server would degrade performance and reliability. Blocking all requests reduces availability, and restricting to one IP address creates a single point of failure.
In the context of high availability, why is it important to create redundant EC2 instances?
Explanation: Redundant EC2 instances enable the system to automatically and quickly recover from failures by rerouting traffic to healthy ones. While redundancy does increase cost, it adds critical availability benefits. Redundancy does not inherently cause inconsistencies or reduce performance; instead, it usually enhances reliability.
Which advantage does auto scaling provide for maintaining availability in EC2 environments?
Explanation: Auto scaling adjusts the number of running EC2 instances in response to traffic levels, ensuring enough capacity to serve users while optimizing resource usage. Manual configuration defeats the purpose of automation, and auto scaling does not prevent every type of failure. Reducing instances without regard to demand would harm availability.
Why is system monitoring crucial in maintaining fault tolerance for EC2 deployments?
Explanation: Continuous monitoring lets you identify problems quickly and can trigger automated recovery measures for uninterrupted service. Monitoring does offer historical data but, more importantly, can give real-time alerts and actions. It does not inherently slow down system performance significantly, nor can it completely eliminate hardware failures.
In a web application using EC2, which component is NOT recommended, as it can create a single point of failure?
Explanation: Having only one instance means if it fails, the entire application becomes unavailable, creating a single point of failure. Distributing instances, using load balancers, and configuring failover systems are all strategies that help avoid single points of failure. These alternatives increase reliability and reduce risk.
How can using an Elastic IP address support high availability in EC2 deployments after a server failure?
Explanation: Elastic IPs can be promptly reassigned to a healthy replacement instance if the primary one fails, minimizing downtime. Disabling traffic or blocking access reduces availability, while permanence to one server removes flexibility in failure scenarios. Remapping improves recovery speed and continuity.
Which approach increases fault tolerance when using user data scripts to configure EC2 instances?
Explanation: Keeping user data scripts in a shared and accessible location means any new or replacement instance can retrieve the same configuration, ensuring consistency after failures. Hardcoding limits recoverability, using different scripts reduces uniformity and resilience, while disabling user data scripts eliminates bootstrapping options entirely.
How does designing EC2-based applications as stateless components contribute to high availability?
Explanation: When applications are stateless, failed servers can be replaced without concern for lost session data, enabling smoother failover. Storing user data locally undermines this approach, as does requiring constant manual backups. Stateless designs typically reduce, not increase, configuration complexity when used appropriately.