Explore the essential principles of error control in wireless communication, focusing on Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) and Forward Error Correction (FEC) techniques. Assess your understanding of how these methods improve data reliability, their key differences, and their practical applications in wireless networks.
In a wireless communication system, which process correctly describes how the Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) protocol manages transmission errors?
Explanation: In ARQ protocols, the receiver checks each received frame and asks for retransmission if an error is found, ensuring accurate data delivery. Unlike FEC, ARQ does not use redundant bits for error correction at the receiver, so the sender option is incorrect. Automatic retransmissions at fixed intervals without error checks would be inefficient and is not standard ARQ behavior. Correcting errors by manually resending entire data files is not part of ARQ and is highly impractical.
Which statement best describes how Forward Error Correction (FEC) operates in a wireless transmission scenario?
Explanation: FEC codes let the receiver detect and often correct errors directly using the extra redundancy added by the sender, making retransmissions unnecessary for many errors. Parity requests from the receiver are part of some ARQ systems but not FEC. Mutual repeated data exchange describes more complex protocols, not standard FEC. Correcting errors only after multiple acknowledgments confuses FEC with ARQ techniques.
In which situation is Forward Error Correction typically preferred over ARQ in wireless communication?
Explanation: FEC is favored when retransmitting data is costly or infeasible, like over satellite connections with long delays. When errors are rare and bandwidth is high, ARQ is usually more efficient due to its lower overhead. Prioritizing error-prone downloads is undesirable for reliable communication, making that distractor incorrect. High-capacity feedback channels do not directly suggest using FEC over ARQ.
What is a primary difference between Stop-and-Wait ARQ and Selective Repeat ARQ protocols in error control?
Explanation: Selective Repeat ARQ enhances efficiency by retransmitting only the frames that were received incorrectly, unlike protocols that require sending all frames after a lost one. Both do not retransmit all frames—this is false for Selective Repeat. Neither ARQ protocol uses forward error correction; FEC is a different method. Selective Repeat can operate in the presence of errors, so the last distractor is incorrect.
When using ARQ in a wireless system, what is the main function of error-detecting codes such as checksums or CRC, as opposed to error-correcting codes?
Explanation: Error-detecting codes, like checksums or CRCs, allow the receiver to identify if data has been corrupted so that a request for retransmission can be sent in ARQ systems. They do not correct errors; that's the role of FEC schemes. Ignoring errors is not a goal of error-detecting codes. Compression and increased speed are unrelated to error detection; they're not provided by these codes.