Explore key concepts of error handling and nullability in GraphQL, understanding how errors are managed and how nullable fields influence API responses. This quiz helps reinforce best practices and common scenarios for building reliable GraphQL APIs.
When a non-nullable field in a nested GraphQL query encounters an error during resolution, what typically happens to the response structure?
Explanation: In GraphQL, when a non-nullable field errors, the parent objects up to the nearest nullable field are replaced with null, preserving the contract of non-nullability. The entire query is not null unless the top-level type is non-nullable and fails. Setting only the erroneous field to null violates the non-nullable guarantee. Ignoring the error or omitting the field from the response does not align with GraphQL's specifications.
What does marking a field as nullable in a GraphQL schema communicate to clients consuming the API?
Explanation: A nullable field in GraphQL indicates that it might return null, such as in cases of errors or missing data. Marking a field nullable does not mean it can never return null—this is only true for non-nullable fields. It does not imply deprecation or necessity in queries. Nullable simply signals clients to handle cases where the value might be absent.
Given a GraphQL response with both 'data' and 'errors' fields present, how does this reflect GraphQL's approach to partial data delivery?
Explanation: In GraphQL, even when errors occur, the 'data' field can include partial results alongside an 'errors' array describing issues encountered. This design enables clients to receive as much information as possible. Execution does not halt at the first error, nor are errors hidden when data exists. The 'errors' field is present even if some data could be retrieved.
In a schema, if a field has an optional argument with no default value, how is its absence in the query handled by GraphQL?
Explanation: If an optional argument has no default and is omitted, GraphQL treats its value as null, allowing resolver logic to handle the missing argument. There's no automatic assignment of zero, nor is a validation error thrown unless the argument is required. Skipping field execution due to a missing optional argument is not the expected behavior.
Which scenario leads to a field being null in a GraphQL response without an entry in the 'errors' array?
Explanation: If a resolver deliberately returns null as part of normal logic and no error condition is triggered, the 'errors' array remains empty and the field's value is null. If an exception occurs, or if required arguments are missing, errors will be noted in the 'errors' array. Fields omitted from the query are not present in the response at all.