Essentials of Dependency Injection in Android: Dagger and Hilt Quiz Quiz

Challenge your understanding of dependency injection patterns in Android development by exploring key concepts, practices, and distinctions between Dagger and Hilt. This quiz will help solidify foundational knowledge of how dependency injection frameworks streamline modular and testable Android applications.

  1. Purpose of Dependency Injection

    What is the main purpose of using dependency injection in Android development?

    1. To manage object creation and simplify code dependencies
    2. To increase application loading time
    3. To enhance graphics rendering
    4. To add more memory to the device

    Explanation: Dependency injection allows developers to better manage how objects are created and how their dependencies are provided, leading to more modular and maintainable code. It does not inherently increase application loading time; in fact, it can often improve efficiency. Enhancing graphics rendering is unrelated to dependency injection. Adding memory to the device is outside the scope of software frameworks.

  2. Key Annotation in Dagger

    Which annotation is used to mark a class as a provider of dependencies in Dagger?

    1. @Export
    2. @Module
    3. @Import
    4. @Activity

    Explanation: @Module tells Dagger that the class provides dependencies for injection, acting as a container for @Provides methods. @Activity, @Export, and @Import are not connected to Dagger’s dependency provision mechanism, making them incorrect choices for marking provider classes.

  3. Dagger Component Interface Role

    What is the role of a component interface in a Dagger setup within an Android project?

    1. It handles background thread management
    2. It replaces all constructors in the codebase
    3. It manages application resources like layouts
    4. It connects modules with injection targets

    Explanation: A component interface in Dagger acts as a bridge between the modules that provide dependencies and the places where these dependencies are needed. Handling threads, replacing constructors, or managing resources are tasks outside a component’s responsibilities. The distractors confuse the concept with other aspects of application development.

  4. Hilt’s Entry Point

    Which annotation is commonly used to indicate an entry point for dependency injection using Hilt in an Activity?

    1. @ActivityEntry
    2. @HiltProvides
    3. @AndroidEntryPoint
    4. @InjectComponent

    Explanation: @AndroidEntryPoint is the annotation that signals Hilt to provide dependencies for Android components like Activities and Fragments. The other options are not valid Hilt annotations; @InjectComponent, @ActivityEntry, and @HiltProvides do not exist in this context, making them incorrect.

  5. Injecting Constructor Dependencies

    How do you specify that a class’s constructor should be used by Dagger or Hilt to fulfill dependencies automatically?

    1. @Inject on the constructor
    2. @Provide on the class
    3. @Bind on the object
    4. @AutoWire on the field

    Explanation: By annotating the constructor with @Inject, you inform Dagger or Hilt to use that constructor when providing an instance of the class. Neither @Provide on the class, @AutoWire, nor @Bind on the object are suitable or valid approaches for automatic constructor injection within these frameworks.

  6. Scope Annotation Purpose

    What is the primary function of Scope annotations such as @Singleton in dependency injection?

    1. To obfuscate code from decompilers
    2. To improve the user interface design
    3. To control the lifespan of provided dependencies
    4. To directly increase processing speed

    Explanation: Scope annotations like @Singleton help manage how long an object will be kept alive, such as creating only one instance per application. They do not affect code security, UI design, or processing speed directly. The distractors are unrelated to the main purpose of dependency scoping.

  7. Hilt’s Application-Level Integration

    Which annotation should be placed on the application class to enable Hilt’s dependency injection throughout an Android app?

    1. @HiltAndroidApp
    2. @AppInject
    3. @ComponentApp
    4. @DaggerEntry

    Explanation: @HiltAndroidApp must be used on the application class to activate Hilt's dependency injection infrastructure. The other annotations either don't exist or are not used for this purpose, making them incorrect.

  8. Module Provision in Hilt

    How do you define a method in a module to supply a dependency in Hilt?

    1. @Export on the interface
    2. @AutoModule on the class
    3. @Provides on the method in the module
    4. @Inject on the variable

    Explanation: You use @Provides on methods inside a module to specify how Hilt (and Dagger) should create a particular dependency. @Inject on variables or class does not define how to supply an object in a module. Neither @AutoModule nor @Export are recognized annotations for dependency provision.

  9. Default Module Installation Scope

    What is the default component to which an unscoped module is installed in Hilt when using the @InstallIn annotation?

    1. ServiceComponent
    2. SingletonComponent
    3. ActivityRetainedComponent
    4. ViewModelComponent

    Explanation: If not otherwise specified, modules are typically installed in the SingletonComponent using Hilt, which ties them to the application's lifecycle. The other components, like ViewModelComponent, ServiceComponent, and ActivityRetainedComponent, are used for more specific scoping needs.

  10. Advantages of Hilt Over Manual Dagger Setup

    What is one main advantage of using Hilt compared to configuring dependency injection manually with Dagger in Android projects?

    1. Better support for binary arithmetic operations
    2. Direct network communication management
    3. Increased code size and complexity
    4. Automatic setup of components and predefined scopes

    Explanation: Hilt simplifies dependency injection by automatically creating common components and providing default scopes, reducing the setup effort required by developers. It does not increase code complexity; instead, it aims to reduce it. Managing network communication and binary arithmetic operations are unrelated to the core purpose of dependency injection frameworks.