Assess your understanding of mobile database normalization principles and effective schema design for efficient data storage, reduced redundancy, and optimal app performance. Explore key concepts like normal forms, functional dependencies, and schema strategies relevant to mobile application development.
Which of the following is the most accurate definition of data redundancy in a mobile database schema?
Explanation: Data redundancy refers to storing identical data in multiple places within a database, which can waste storage and lead to inconsistencies. Unique constraints enforce value uniqueness, but aren't about redundancy. Allowing duplicate usernames is a data entry policy issue, not schema redundancy. Using different data types may cause compatibility problems but doesn't inherently mean redundant data.
A mobile app logs user actions, storing in a table with one column containing a list of actions separated by commas. Why does this structure violate First Normal Form (1NF)?
Explanation: First Normal Form requires each column to contain only single, indivisible values, not a list. While primary keys and unique identifiers are important, they are addressed in later normalization and general database design, not specifically 1NF. The use of commas in column names is not related to normalization.
Which scenario best describes a violation of Second Normal Form (2NF) in a mobile database schema with a composite primary key?
Explanation: 2NF is violated when a non-key attribute depends only on part of a composite primary key, leading to partial dependency. A single-column primary key cannot have partial dependency issues. Having columns with the same name in different tables is not a normalization violation by itself. Missing foreign keys pertain to referential integrity, not 2NF.
Which of the following statements correctly identifies Third Normal Form (3NF) for a mobile app's user profile table?
Explanation: 3NF ensures that all non-key columns depend only on the primary key, removing transitive dependencies. No repeating groups refers to 1NF, not 3NF. Composite keys are not prohibited in 3NF. Uniqueness constraints are a separate concept and do not guarantee compliance with 3NF.
When designing a schema for a mobile app that frequently displays user orders, which approach can improve query speed and lower device resource use?
Explanation: Normalizing up to 3NF reduces redundancy, and selectively denormalizing common order summaries improves performance. Storing all data in one table can slow queries and use excessive resources. Indexes, despite increasing write cost, improve query speed, which is vital for mobile apps. Using only text types ignores appropriate data typing and can harm efficiency.
In a mobile database, if each user has a unique email and their phone number is stored in the same row, what functional dependency does this represent?
Explanation: The email field uniquely identifies a user, so it functionally determines associated data like phone number. The reverse is not guaranteed, as phone numbers may not be unique. Saying the schema is not normalized lacks context, and claiming no relationship misses the definition of functional dependency.
Why is it important to define a primary key for each table in a mobile app's database schema?
Explanation: Primary keys uniquely identify each record, supporting data integrity and reliable lookups. They do not affect storage capacity or restrict column count. While most common in relational databases, unique identifiers help in any structured data, not just relational models.
Which normalization benefit helps prevent update anomalies in a mobile app’s contact list database?
Explanation: Reducing redundancy means data is stored in one place, so updates do not create inconsistencies. Allowing duplicate rows increases the chance of update errors. Grouping unrelated attributes wastes storage and complicates updates. Full denormalization may boost read speed but raises inconsistency risks during updates.
If a mobile messaging app must store chat messages from multiple users in different groups, which schema is appropriate for a one-to-many relationship?
Explanation: Using a foreign key in the messages table efficiently tracks which group each message belongs to, representing a one-to-many link. Storing multiple messages in a single field breaks normalization. Including group names in every user profile is redundant and not scalable. Omitting relational links sacrifices data integrity.
When designing a mobile database schema for storing user birthdays, which column data type should be used?
Explanation: A date or datetime type stores dates efficiently and supports date operations. Integer is inappropriate because birthdays are not solely numeric. Varchar allows flexibility but doesn't enable date-specific functions. Binary is used for non-textual data, not dates.