Test your knowledge of Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) data structure, its algorithms, and core applications such as cycle detection, Kruskal’s algorithm, and connected component analysis.
Detecting Cycles Efficiently
Given an undirected graph with N nodes and M edges, which approach using Disjoint Set Union (DSU) most effectively detects cycles during the addition of each edge?
- Union nodes only, then count degrees
- Use BFS for every insertion
- Check if two nodes are in the same set before union
- Merge all sets at once before processing
- Sort edges by weight before union
Optimized DSU Operations
What is the amortized time complexity per operation when both path compression and union by rank are used in a DSU implementation with N elements?
- O(N)
- O(log N)
- O(log log N)
- O(α(N))
- O(1)
Kruskal’s Algorithm and DSU
In Kruskal's Minimum Spanning Tree algorithm, how does DSU prevent cycles during the construction of the spanning tree?
- It removes the heaviest edge each time
- It prioritizes degree of nodes
- It ensures only edges connecting different sets are added
- It checks all paths from source to destination
- It only connects nodes of the same set
Path Compression Functionality
Which operation in DSU directly contributes to flattening the tree structure for faster subsequent searches: union by rank or path compression?
- Find with parent reset
- Heapify
- Unio by rnak
- Path compresion
- Union with size
Connected Component Counting
Given a graph of 10 nodes and a set of edges, how would you utilize DSU to compute the total number of connected components after all unions?
- Divide total edges by 2
- Use BFS from each node
- Count unique leaders after all finds
- Sum degrees of all nodes
- Multiply number of unions by 2
Union by Rank vs. Union by Size
Suppose you implement union by size in one DSU and union by rank in another; what practical difference might emerge regarding the resulting tree heights?
- Union by rank merges smaller sets into larger regardless of rank
- There is no difference at all
- Union by size always creates linear trees
- Trees in union by size may be taller
- Union by rank guarantees shorter trees
DSU in Dynamic Connectivity
When processing a sequence of queries, each asking whether two nodes are in the same connected component in a dynamic graph, why is DSU preferred over adjacency lists or matrices?
- DSU provides faster updates and queries for large graphs
- Adjacency lists cannot track previous connections
- Adjacency matrices can only be used for weighted graphs
- DSU has lower memory overhead for all operations
- DSU can insert self-loops directly
DSU for Edge Removal
What is a primary limitation of classic DSU regarding edge removals in a dynamically changing undirected graph?
- DSU only works for directed graphs
- Removing an edge automatically merges sets
- DSU cannot efficiently remove connections once added
- DSU doubles the memory needed after removal
- Edge removals make path compression less effective
Generalized Applications
Which of the following problems cannot be efficiently solved using a standard DSU data structure?
- Minimum spanning tree computation
- Connected component labeling
- Connectivity after arbitrary edge deletions
- Dynamic connectivity queries
- Finding cycles in an undirected graph
Advanced DSU Extension
Suppose you need to support both union and query for the minimum value within each set; what DSU extension would allow you to maintain this property efficiently?
- Use degree of each node as set representative
- Apply path compression aggressively after every query
- Store and update minimum value at the root during union
- Recompute minimums globally after each update
- Sort sets after every union operation