Challenge your understanding of pseudocode for popular algorithms, covering sorting, searching, and key programming concepts. Assess your ability to interpret and apply pseudocode as it relates to algorithmic problem-solving.
Given the following pseudocode: FOR i from 1 to N-1, IF arr[i] u003E arr[i+1], swap arr[i] and arr[i+1], END FOR. What sorting algorithm does this pseudocode represent?
Explanation: This pseudocode reflects the core idea of Bubble Sort, where adjacent elements are compared and swapped to 'bubble' larger values towards the end. Selection Sort finds the minimum to place in each position, which is not shown. Insertion Sort builds a sorted section by shifting elements, while Merge Sort splits and merges arrays, neither of which matches the presented logic. Only Bubble Sort fits the repeated adjacent swapping shown.
In the pseudocode: FOR each element in list, IF element equals target, RETURN index, END FOR, RETURN -1. What will be returned if the target is not present in the list?
Explanation: The correct answer is -1, which signals that the target was not found after checking all elements. Returning 0 could be confused with a valid index. Returning null depends on the language but is not specified here. Returning the length of the list is not standard and would be misleading. The pseudocode clearly specifies RETURN -1 in the absence of a found element.
If a pseudocode involves repeatedly dividing a sorted list in half to find a target, which algorithm does this best describe?
Explanation: Binary Search is characterized by dividing the search space in half each time, especially in sorted lists. Linear Search does not divide lists; it checks elements one by one. Quick Sort also divides arrays but for sorting, not searching. ‘Bubble Search’ is not a recognized algorithm, possibly a mix-up with Bubble Sort. Binary Search is the only correct logic match.
Which pseudocode correctly finds the largest number in a list called nums?
Explanation: The correct pseudocode initializes a variable with the first list element and updates it if a larger value is found, ensuring the largest is found after one pass. The second option finds the minimum, not the maximum. The third option incorrectly uses indices and a confusing max update. The fourth is unrelated, as it sums even numbers rather than finding a maximum.
Consider this pseudocode: IF n equals 0 THEN RETURN 1 ELSE RETURN n times factorial of n-1. What concept is demonstrated here?
Explanation: This pseudocode exemplifies recursion, where a function calls itself to solve a smaller instance of the same problem, as seen with factorials. Iteration involves looping, which is not shown here. Selection usually refers to conditional branching but lacks the self-calling aspect. Sorting relates to rearranging items, not recursive calculation. Only recursion fits the behavior described.