Exploring Injection Attacks Beyond SQL in OWASP Top 10 Quiz

This quiz delves into various types of injection attacks highlighted by the OWASP Top 10, going beyond SQL injection to cover advanced threats like LDAP, OS command, and NoSQL injection. Sharpen your knowledge of these security risks and learn to identify vulnerabilities through realistic scenarios and key concepts in security testing.

  1. Question 1

    Which type of injection attack exploits a system by injecting malicious commands into an operating system interface, such as when a web application allows users to provide file names for processing?

    1. OS Command Injection
    2. SQL Injection
    3. Cross-Site Script Injection
    4. Header Injection

    Explanation: OS Command Injection occurs when untrusted input is used to build or execute system commands, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server. SQL Injection targets databases, not operating system commands, and Cross-Site Script Injection affects client browsers, not OS interfaces. Header Injection manipulates HTTP headers, which is different from executing system-level commands. Recognizing the nature of the vulnerable interface is key to identifying OS command injection.

  2. Question 2

    In a scenario where user input is used to construct an LDAP search filter, what kind of injection attack could allow an attacker to bypass authentication?

    1. LDAP Injection
    2. XML Injection
    3. Code Injection
    4. CSV Injection

    Explanation: LDAP Injection occurs when user inputs are improperly sanitized and used to construct LDAP queries, which can allow attackers to bypass authentication or access unauthorized data. XML Injection impacts XML data structures, not LDAP. Code Injection is broader and generally refers to the execution of arbitrary code rather than attacks specific to LDAP. CSV Injection involves spreadsheet files and is unrelated to directory service queries.

  3. Question 3

    Which of the following best describes a NoSQL injection attack as found in some document-based database systems?

    1. Manipulating query objects to access or modify unauthorized documents
    2. Inserting XML tags that alter database logic
    3. Sending malformed HTTP headers
    4. Using classic SQL syntax to bypass user authentication

    Explanation: NoSQL injection exploits weaknesses in input validation by modifying query objects, enabling attackers to access or change data without proper authorization. XML tag insertion relates to XML injection, not NoSQL databases. Sending malformed HTTP headers is a different vulnerability known as header injection. Using classic SQL syntax is specific to SQL injection, not NoSQL systems that utilize JSON-like queries.

  4. Question 4

    An attacker submits unsanitized input into a server-side template engine, causing the execution of unintended code. What type of injection attack does this describe?

    1. Server-Side Template Injection
    2. Path Injection
    3. HTML Attribute Injection
    4. Object Injection

    Explanation: Server-Side Template Injection allows attackers to execute unauthorized code within template engines when user input is improperly handled. Path Injection deals with file or directory paths, HTML Attribute Injection manipulates HTML element attributes, and Object Injection typically refers to manipulating application logic or object instantiation rather than template processing. Distinguishing the underlying technology is vital for classification.

  5. Question 5

    Which defense is generally most effective for preventing a wide range of injection attacks beyond SQL injection in web applications?

    1. Validating and sanitizing all user inputs
    2. Relying solely on web server configuration
    3. Encrypting all client-side data
    4. Blocking all POST requests

    Explanation: Carefully validating and sanitizing all user inputs is the most robust preventive measure against multiple injection attack types because it ensures untrusted data does not lead to exploited vulnerabilities. Solely configuring the web server does not address input handling, encrypting client-side data does not prevent input-based attacks, and blocking all POST requests is impractical and does not cover attacks using other HTTP methods. Proper input handling remains the cornerstone of injection defense.