Understanding Vulnerability Detection Rules in Code Analysis Quiz

Explore key vulnerability detection rules used in both static and dynamic code analysis techniques. This quiz challenges your ability to identify, evaluate, and understand common security weaknesses and how they are detected during security testing processes.

  1. Detecting SQL Injection

    When analyzing a codebase for SQL injection vulnerabilities, which pattern should a detection rule flag in static code analysis?

    1. Directly concatenating user input into SQL queries
    2. Converting user input to uppercase before processing
    3. Storing SQL queries in commented-out code blocks
    4. Using parameterized queries for all SQL statements

    Explanation: Directly concatenating user input into SQL queries exposes the application to SQL injection attacks, making it a clear target for static analysis rules. Converting input to uppercase does not prevent injection or indicate a risk. Code in comments is not executed and therefore not immediately vulnerable. Using parameterized queries is a secure approach and should not be flagged as a vulnerability.

  2. Identifying Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

    In dynamic code analysis, which behavior is most indicative of a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on a web application?

    1. JavaScript input reflected and executed in the browser without sanitization
    2. Strong password required during user registration
    3. Login page redirects users after successful authentication
    4. Error messages are logged to a local file

    Explanation: Reflected and unsanitized JavaScript that is executed by the browser signifies a classic XSS vulnerability, as detected by dynamic analysis tools. Strong password requirements are a security best practice, not a vulnerability. Redirects after login and logging error messages are unrelated to XSS, making them poor indicators for this issue.

  3. Sensitive Data Exposure Detection

    Which rule should trigger in static analysis when source code reveals hardcoded credentials, such as passwords in plaintext variables?

    1. Hardcoded credential detection
    2. Dead code identification
    3. Null pointer dereference detection
    4. Dynamic memory leak monitoring

    Explanation: Hardcoded credential detection rules are specifically designed to flag plaintext passwords or secrets found in source code. Dead code refers to unused code and is not related to sensitive data. Null pointer dereference detection concerns potential runtime errors, not security flaws. Memory leak monitoring addresses resource cleanup and not data confidentiality.

  4. Insecure Deserialization Vulnerability

    During security testing, which code pattern is a static analyzer most likely to flag as an insecure deserialization risk?

    1. Deserializing objects received directly from untrusted sources
    2. Serializing JSON data for API requests
    3. Validating user input with regular expressions
    4. Using loops for input validation

    Explanation: Deserializing objects from untrusted sources can open the door to remote code execution or other attacks, so static analysis rules flag this pattern. Serializing data or validating input helps ensure safe communication and does not create deserialization risks. Validating with loops or regular expressions is generally good practice and not inherently insecure in this context.

  5. Dynamic Analysis and Command Injection

    Which scenario should dynamic testing rules most urgently flag as a potential command injection vulnerability?

    1. Application executes operating system commands using unsanitized user input
    2. User password is stored using strong hashing algorithms
    3. Source code contains extensive inline documentation
    4. System logs include timestamps for each entry

    Explanation: Executing system commands with unsanitized user input presents a serious command injection threat and must be detected in dynamic testing. Storing passwords with strong hashing is recommended and not a vulnerability. Documentation and logging timestamps are unrelated to injection, so they do not represent security risks in this scenario.