This quiz explores the key differences, advantages, and use cases of blue-green and canary deployment strategies in software delivery. Improve your understanding of deployment patterns and discover when and why to use each approach for efficient, low-risk application updates.
In a blue-green deployment, what happens to user traffic when deploying a new version of an application?
Explanation: In a blue-green deployment, traffic is rerouted all at once from the current (blue) to the new (green) environment. This allows for an immediate switchover with a quick rollback if needed. Canary deployments shift traffic gradually, making option three incorrect. Option two describes random traffic distribution, which is not part of either strategy. Option four refers to phased internal testing, which is not standard in blue-green deployment.
Which deployment strategy involves releasing a new application version to a small subset of users before making it available to everyone?
Explanation: Canary deployment means releasing updates to a small group of users first, allowing issues to be identified before a full rollout. Blue-green deployment involves a full switch for all users at once. Grey deployment and rolling restart are terms that may sound similar but do not specifically describe this gradual exposure approach.
If a new release causes problems and needs immediate rollback, which deployment strategy typically allows for the fastest reversion?
Explanation: With blue-green deployment, rolling back is as simple as routing all traffic back to the previous environment, providing very fast recovery. Canary deployment rollbacks may involve re-adjusting traffic splits, which can be slower. Manual and incremental deployments often require additional steps, making them less efficient for instant rollback.
Which strategy is best for detecting issues in a new release with minimal risk to the entire user base?
Explanation: Canary deployment exposes a new version to a small user group, reducing the risk to most users while allowing early detection of issues. Blue-green deployment will shift everyone at once, which might affect all users if a problem occurs. Parallel and direct deployments either run side-by-side or update immediately, neither of which specifically manages risk through gradual exposure.
Which statement about infrastructure costs in blue-green deployments is true?
Explanation: Blue-green deployments need two complete environments—blue and green—running simultaneously during the switch. This can temporarily double costs. They do not necessarily lower costs, as in option two. Option three is incorrect because both environments must be active during deployment. The last option is incorrect, as a testing environment is still recommended.
A business wants to minimize risk and gather feedback from only 10% of users before rolling out fully. Which deployment strategy should they choose?
Explanation: Canary deployment allows for gradual exposure to a small segment, such as 10%, permitting feedback and risk reduction. Blue-green deployment switches all users at once, and batch and direct cutover do not specifically offer limited, planned exposure like canary does.
How is user traffic handled during a blue-green deployment cutover?
Explanation: In blue-green deployment, all traffic is redirected from the blue to the green environment in a single move, making the transition immediate. The other options do not accurately describe the typical process, as gradual splits or hourly alternations are not standard and internal user limitation is not a defining feature.
Which deployment approach emphasizes monitoring user experience after exposing a small group to a new release before continuing the rollout?
Explanation: Canary deployment specifically monitors early users for issues before expanding the rollout. Blue-green deployment moves everyone at once, which limits focused monitoring on a small group. Static and snapshot deployments are unrelated to this phased, monitored release process.
In which deployment strategy will some users see the updated version of the application before others?
Explanation: Canary deployments introduce updates to a selected group first, so only some users see changes initially. Rolling restarts do sequential updates but not necessarily by user group. Blue-green deployment switches all users simultaneously, and monolithic deployment typically updates everything at once without gradual exposure.
When is blue-green deployment especially preferred over canary deployment?
Explanation: Blue-green deployment excels when a fast, total switchover is needed and rollback must be simple. Canary deployment is better for gradual feedback and targeted monitoring, making option two incorrect here. Options three and four do not align with the strengths of blue-green deployment.