Assess your understanding of essential concepts and workflows related to pull requests, including creation, review, merging strategies, and conflict resolution. This quiz helps clarify common scenarios and best practices within the GitHub tools ecosystem, supporting efficient collaboration and code quality.
When creating a pull request from a feature branch to the main branch, what is the primary purpose of this action in collaborative development?
Explanation: The core function of a pull request is to propose and discuss changes, allowing collaborators to review code before it is merged into important branches. Directly overwriting the main branch bypasses critical review steps and collaboration. Permanently locking a branch is unrelated to pull requests, and archiving is not part of pull request workflows. Only the correct answer promotes teamwork and code quality.
If a reviewer requests changes on your pull request due to coding style inconsistencies, what is the most suitable next step?
Explanation: The best practice is to make the suggested improvements and push updates to the same branch, ensuring the review process addresses quality concerns. Abandoning or closing the pull request wastes collaborative effort, and merging without changes disregards the review process. Only updating your branch aligns with effective collaboration and code standards.
Which merge method creates a new commit on the base branch and keeps all individual commits from the feature branch intact?
Explanation: A merge commit method combines changes and preserves the full commit history from the feature branch, adding a new commit to record the merge. Squash merge consolidates all commits into one, while fast-forward, spelled here as 'fast-forwad', does not create a merge commit if possible. Cherry-pick applies selected commits rather than merging branches. Only the correct option maintains the full commit lineage.
What should you do when a pull request cannot be merged automatically because of conflicts with the base branch?
Explanation: When a pull request is blocked by conflicts, you must resolve them in your branch and push the updates, enabling a clean merge. Closing or deleting the pull request without action leaves the problem unsolved. Rebasing the base onto the feature branch reverses standard merging workflow and can cause confusion. Only manual conflict resolution helps advance the pull request.
If a repository requires passing status checks and at least one approval before merging, what happens if you try to merge a pull request before these are met?
Explanation: With required status checks and approvals, merges are blocked until all are satisfied, and the user is alerted about any missing prerequisites. Merging without meeting these controls is not permitted, so options two and four are incorrect. Automatic approvals do not occur, so option three is invalid. The correct option ensures quality and compliance in the workflow.